Categories
Opinions Writing in General

Interview With Anon: An Honest Critique of Writergram

For quite some time, in the Instagram writing community there has been a discussion about repetition within the space, or issues it has. I got into contact with Anon after he interacted with my “Is Writergram repetitive?” story (March 20). He provided a very interesting response and I wanted him to expand upon his initial response.

The interview was conducted over Instagram DMs between March 21-24, 2022. This is the uncut version, with minor edits made for grammar, readability, or formatting. No hate or disrespect will be directed to the interviewee, who wishes to remain anonymous.

A note for those unfamiliar with the term “writergram”: “Writergram” refers to a niche community on Instagram focused on writing advice, sharing information about original content, and generally fixates on genre fiction. The community primarily consists of young adults and teens.


Q: You mentioned in your original response to my question box that you find the jokes on Writergram repetitive and not relatable. Could you expand on that thought?

A: So I’m in a very different spot than most of the writers here. I haven’t been writing since childhood, only for about 3 years now. I didn’t grow up reading a lot of fiction. The odd novel here and there but mostly books on science, space and dinosaurs. All of writergrams favourite books I’ve never read. Never read [Harry Potter] or [Percy Jackson]. Hell, I had never even HEARD of [Shadow & Bone] until the community had a collective aneurysm to Netflix announcement. So I’m already not relating to most experiences on here. But I think the biggest differences between them and me is due to theatre and fandom. I was a fan of things that did have fandoms (Gravity Falls, Pokémon, Musicals) but I never got involved with fandom (probably because of the mindset of constant internet stranger danger). And I know fandom is linked with fanfiction (and general YA fiction), and that has a lot of emphasis on tropes. That’s where the trouble starts. I’ll say: it don’t get tropes. I don’t care for them. I don’t go looking for them.

I don’t have strong opinions on any of them. And it’s not made better by the fact that theatre does have tropes, they’re not consistent across all the very diverse styles. Or maybe they are, but I just don’t care for them so I don’t notice them. Maybe you can put this together yourself, but when two people have completely different experiences and opinions with stories, and don’t consume same media, or if you do it’s not in the same way, they’re gonna be feeling awkward around each other. I have felt like a bit of an outsider in the community. I remember being jealous of accounts that got a “new writer alert” surprise that got them 200 followers in on days when it took me over a year to reach 100. And when you’re passively alienated like this, Bertolt Brecht starts making a lot more sense. I started looking at these posts and I noticed repetitions in posts, reels, general styles, etc.

Here are some ones I can name off the top of my head include:

  • Dialogue tags
  •  How to write X group/trope -“I kill/traumatise my characters” 
  • “I don’t get sleep lmao” 
  • The writing community needs to stop romanticising not sleeping”
  •  Taylor Swift is God -Fantasy/YA romance are the only books that exist
  •  Marvel movies are the movies to exist
  •  “When X trope does this, I go *keyboard smash*” 
  • Enemies to Lovers, Found Family, Morally grey characters and arson are the only tropes in existence

I’m stopping myself there because I may go into full blown rambling. But I don’t relate to any of these. And so when you see these things over again and you aren’t caught up in the emotion of “speaking the truth” per se, you get a little bit… desensitised. Oh and also not obsessively in love with characters, my own or some from a some piece of media.


Q: Are there other fundamental things that you think the writergram community needs to improve upon? Why?

A: I’m scared this part may make me sound like an asshole but I can’t put it any other way. Okay one thing nags me about the whole thing with likes going down is that I see stories like “my likes used to be 900 now they’re at 700” and I’m like “listen, I’m sorry that a solid proportion of your followers probably are no longer seeing your posts, that’s sad I’ll admit. At the same time, can’t relate. I max out at like 25 likes and like 6 of them are probably spam bots” I say this makes me sound like an asshole because I understand that just because someone has it worse than you doesn’t mean your feelings are invalid. That’s true here. And I can also say that I have felt the same thing when my likes on a post are lower than usual. And I have to knock myself into shape by telling myself “shut up. You make good content. This is not a reflection of your ability” or something [I don’t know], I forget about posting for too many days so it’s not really a big deal for me.

But it’s a definitely not a good thing, and not unique to this community. The fact is: when something meant for escapism and fun from normal human shit, making about getting approval from strangers, and making gaining that approval a labour. That’s not good, and drains the fun. I’m not saying it’s easy to get out of the social media creator mindset, but at least make an effort. If you react poorly, just figure why you did and correct yourself. The only person punish you is you. So just take a fucking chill pill and make something fun.

The fact is: when something meant for escapism and fun from normal human shit, making about getting approval from strangers, and making gaining that approval a labour.


Q: In your opinion, what do you think are some ways to break out of this rut the writing community may (or may not) be in?

A: Well to know how to stop something, you have to know why it happened. And that’s difficult in this situation. Obviously the algorithm exists and there’s not much we can do about that except gain it. Really social media accounts are just businesses that replaced money with approval. So apologies but I’m about revert to my less than a year’s worth of A-Level Business Studies to try and answer this. Profit is made when supply a demand. Simply, the demand for what the community has been putting out was at a high, and has now dropped. People want something else that the community isn’t supplying, so they’re not buying. So what has been buying? Well my evidence is based on an unreliable sample and anecdotal evidence but I’d say we’re moving in a more story-specific direction. I’ve posts about asking your [original characters]s questions and how to write certain characters flop, while posts about writing X story do very well. That’s why trope based jokes are doing well.

Back when lockdown started and went hard on us, making posts on the little imaginary people we made up to talk to and project all the things we could if only we could go outside was fun and needed. But now a lot of things have eased up, and now you can do the things you wanted. Instead of vining with situations from incorrect quotes, you now have to make something worth telling. Worth doing. Story is replacing character as the big discussion point, and we need to supply the demand.


Q:  What would you like to see more of in the writing community?

A: I do want more discussion of themes and intention behind stories. I’ve never found those epic plot descriptions in trailers that are like “would you read a story about an assassin who fights the evil Queen and falls in the royal mage”. Idk I feel like that’s a mad libs challenge with the blanks filled. Just makes sure it’s YA Fantasy with a mix of passionate romance and high tragedy. But I want to know what this story is putting out into the world. I love when a story teases what its underlying themes. Example: People, Places and Things by Duncan MacMillan: “When intoxication feels like the only way to survive the modern world, how can she ever sober up?” I read that, I know I’m going to think about something, rather than just blindly feel.


 Q: What would you like to see less of in the writing community?

A: I know this is the internet, and what I ask for is very unlikely to come about, but I would like to see less absolutes. More nuance. Recently, after I answered the first batch of questions, I post my explore page that was very absolute about a method on improving dialogue. And, as someone who writes a lot of dialogue, I both understand the point and also think it completely missed the mark. A solid amount of advice is “always/never do this” when a lot more of it should be “if you’re going to do this, understand this/look out for this/do this as well/etc”. No method is going to work for everyone. They all have their pros and cons. Like IRL tools, every tip is best used when you know how use them and what they do. I feel like some of that is missing (probably in myself as well).


Q: Why do you think the writing community is prone to repetition?

A: Simple. It’s the reason most things are repetitive and don’t change. It’s just comfy where we are, for both creators and consumers. As creators, we’re still getting the positive feedback in the form of likes and comments. Whenever we make a character death joke, we know people will relate to them but we mix it up just a little bit by using the one TikTok audio that’s popular [right now]. Whenever we try something more experimental, it flops. That’s our sign to never leave our comfort zone again. As consumers, when we see something we already recognise, there’s the relief of risk. “That’s the classic writing community again” we say as we get a small blip of nice brain chemicals. When we something new, it’s off-putting. “We’ve gathered here because of our shared taste sense of humour. What is this new thing? It’s not what I thought you were”. This happens in business and in friendship. Companies releasing a slightly different version of the same product everytime.

And we do it with our friends. We tell the same jokes to keep them around. And what if that friend does something completely unexpected of them? How does that change how you see them. (Yasmina Reza’s “Art” is [a] great play about exactly this).


Q: Are there ideas (within craft, tropes, characters, etc.) that you think writergram is misrepresenting?

A: I guess I’ll say that realism, as opposed to escapism, needs to be re-understood. Like, I get it. Escapism isn’t just fun, it’s a necessity. I even have a side [work in progress] about a teen’s mental health going down the drain giving up her escape in order to pursue success. But what I’m getting at is that escapism is perfect and realism is not to be touched. It’s a sentiment not explicitly stated, but it’s more subtly, likely unintentionally, implied. Everything about character and plot and tropes is to project and stuff. I’m not with that. Realism gets you thinking about yourself, the people around you, the whole world around you. And I know the world is scary, but the first step to fixing it is to think about it. Generally, I think we need a mix of realism and escapism in our lives, and I’m just getting the sense that it’s tilting a bit too far in one direction. I legitimately once saw someone ask for book recs, but added “I only read fantasy” and threw me way off?

Like, I’d never think a fantasy writer could be so unimaginative. Do you know how limiting that is? As a reader and a writer? That you could miss out on your new favourite book, or an entirely new trope to add to your book because you’re so conservative with your tastes. Honestly I could never.

Realism gets you thinking about yourself, the people around you, the whole world around you. And I know the world is scary, but the first step to fixing it is to think about it.


Q: Are there other things that you would like to talk about that I didn’t bring up so far in the interview?

A: Just know I don’t hate the writing community. I’m not here to spread drama, despite being a drama student. And even if it was, strangely I think it would have benefits. I’ve never seen the community interact with each other more with each other than when a drama shakes it. That’s with every community, but still applies. If anything, what I hope to accomplish with all this word vomit is to get people to think about the community. Think about why they’re doing what they’re doing. Think about how long they can keep it up. And think about what they could change. Because as storytellers, change is what we’re all about.

Categories
Opinions Writing in General

What Constitutes “Bad Writing” and Why Are We Bothered By It?

We’ve all been victim to picking up a book we really wanted to read and when we get knee deep into the story, there’s this dark wave of realization that the book is awful. Some of us love rant reviews. Others get really bothered by bad books and don’t want to talk about them. Some power through them and I never do.

We all know what a bad book is, as in, when we hear someone say “this wasn’t a good book”, we know precisely what they’re talking about. I want to dive deeper into elements that make up a “bad book” or “poor writing”, then I want to explore why we’re so bothered by it.


Factor One: Janky Grammar and Clunky Prose. 

This is one of the easiest problems to identify and one of the most irritating. It grinds gears because it takes the reader out of what’s being said. For example, a phrase that is poorly worded, there’s a run-on sentence the size of Moby Dick, words are misspelled, or any number of atrocities committed against commas remove readers from the work.

Most aren’t looking for excellent prose; it’s just that readers don’t want to be tripping over words in their own head. If you can’t properly word a sentence, then people aren’t going to take you seriously. Janky grammar and or prose is by far the most common mistakes made. Most fluent English speakers have taken an English class or have peeked into the wild world of grammar, so they recognize a mistake when they see one. Compare that to things like pacing or intreite prose rules, where most won’t be able to point a finger at why the sentence doesn’t flow (they’ll still notice that the sentence doesn’t read right).

You don’t need to be an expert in grammar, but you do need to be familiar with it. People aren’t stupid and they will notice. Maintain a grammar standard.

Note that I’m not referring to folks who are just starting to learn English/don’t have a fantastic grasp on the language. They obviously get a pass. This is more so directed at people who are native speakers or are extremely fluent.


Factor Two: Lousy Voice 

Found on Pinterest

This is the more artistic side of our previous prose problem. Voice is the extra little umph to a sentence; it’s what adds character and distinguishes one writer’s work from another. For example, word choice or general sentence structures. Voice isn’t the be all end all of everything, and if you don’t have a distinct voice just yet, don’t worry — soon you can also go through the anguish of finding your writing style.

It’s easiest to illustrate voice through examples. I’m going to be using a situation from Johnathan Stroud’s The Whispering Skull.

“Quill Kipps is annoying to the point where it reaches his looks, and it’s not like he has the skill to back up his smack talk. I would love to punch him then walk away.”

Me, in a tired daze

It’s not awful per se, and having a brief description like that can be useful shorthand — like reminding a reader of someone. However, this is the first time in the book that I’m using that the character Kipps is being described. It’s… fine. About as spicy as a cardboard box but passable.

Let’s now compare that to how it’s originally written:

“Being undiplomatic (but more precise), I’d say he’s a pint-sized, pug-nosed, carrot-topped inadequate with a chip the size of Big Ben on his weedy shoulder. A sneer on legs. A malevolent buffoon. He’s too old to be any good with ghosts, but that doesn’t stop him from wearing the blingiest rapier you’ll ever see, weighed down to the pommel with cheap jewels.”

The Whispering Skull, page 18
Found on Pinterest

This passage conveys so much sass, so much, well, voice. It’s oozing with it. My sentence is, again, passible, but you’re given only the barest, most brittle of bones. With the passage written by Stroud, you get a marvelous idea of: what the narrator thinks of Kipps, where they are approximately, how Kipps looks, and wee bit of world building. This is essential to making a story stick with your reader; giving them something to hold on to on a molecular level.

Before this excerpt, there was a physical description of Kipps, but that paired with the voicy description of him brings up the saturation of the piece. Lucy — the narrator — is filling these pages to the brim with her personality, and everything is through Lucy-tinted lenses. The book would be extremely different if it were told through the eyes of another character. A little bit of Stroud shines through in his writing (naturally), but this is all Lucy.

Voice can be polarizing. The enjoyment of prose isn’t entirely dependent on how it was created, rather, the reader. The example I presented to you is right up my dry-humored alley, but you may have thought that Lucy was being too harsh, or think that my mish-mash of words is entirely unpleasant to the eye (in which case I don’t disagree).

When it teeters into “objectively” bad territory is when the voice overwhelms what’s trying to be said, or, it’s blandness seems to suck up color like a sponge. You don’t need to be weighing down your writing with cheap jewels. Think purple prose (where the prose is so outlandish and insubstantial it overwhelms the reader). You want to use voice to accentuate the characters, or bring the world to life. Author and YouTuber Alexa Donne made an excellent video entitled, “Writing With Voice — Does it Truly Matter?” where she goes into detail about how important it is to be a voicey writer in today’s writing climate.

There is also something called passive voice. Passive voice is when the subject of the sentence is standing by while the object of the sentence performs the work. This pertains more to my previous grammar section, but it fits snugly here.

“The chocolate cake was made by Sam.” 

That’s an example of passive voice. The subject is Sam and the object is the chocolate cake.

You may hear advice that tells you to avoid passive voice. That’s because passive voice has a nasty tendency to be muddled and drags the sentence. It can be utilized tactfully when you want to make the sentence muggy (or other cases), otherwise, just use active voice.

Active voice is when the subject is acting upon the object.

“Sam was making the chocolate cake.”

Here’s an article you can read that goes into more detail about active and passive voice.


 Factor Three: Crappy Characters

Found on Pinterest

This a massive one for me — if I don’t enjoy reading about your characters, I won’t enjoy the story. Some readers love purposefully unlikeable characters (like Mr. Darcy), but all  that backfires when it’s made apparent that this character was created to be likeable. This is evident in the way that other characters and story treats the protagonist: everything is too easy, they’re too well liked, or they act like an ass but no one does anything about it (but they can).

Let me introduce Mary Sue/Gary Sue. Mary Sues/Gary Sues are often overpowered, the world and other characters always bend to their will, and more often than not they’re beyond perfect. They lack a substantial personality, and most importantly, they hardly ever learn impactful lessons. These characters are plain annoying because they aren’t challenged in meaningful ways. Sure, a baddie may do a Bad Thing to them, but they always bounce back up like springs — never bothered and always winning.

Readers can’t empathize with these sorts of characters because they’re virtually flawless.

Crappy characters also appear when they aren’t fully developed. They can be unbalanced (ex: the hero without flaws, or the villian with no humanity at all), lack motivation, autonomy, or personality. No one wants to read about a potato sack being dragged around by the plot. 

You can have a good set-up to a character, have them all lined up for a nice arc or what have you, but they never get fired off. Or, if they do, they’re a dud and land in the mud with a little splat. The main character(s) have to be dynamic, going from good to bad or vice versa is up to the writer, but they need to change in some way over the course of the story. If they don’t the reader is going to wonder what the point even was. Side characters need to be people in the sense they have their own lives, but they don’t need arcs all of the time. Pick and choose your battles because you don’t want to overwhelm your reader with too many moving parts.

They don’t always need to be good people or be the most well rounded, but they all need to have a point. Readers recognize pointless persons and they’re going to get bored.

There could be a lack of connectivity between the reader and character. Not every character you create needs to be adored by readers, nor does everyone need to have this deep connection with the fake people. But, there needs to be something there. That exact “something” isn’t for me to define. We all have read about characters that we just don’t give a shit about, find borning, etc.

If no one cares about the characters, they’re not going to care about the story. Simple as that. Character creation is complicated and I highly advise you to do further research. Here is a free MasterClass article entitled, “How to Develop Fictional Characters: 8 Tips for Character Development” to get you started.


Factor Four: Sloppy Pacing

Found on Pinterest

Everything is moving at a gallop in the book, then everything stops for some info-dumping or a really windy dialogue scene. Or, we’re running at a breakneck speed and there’s no room to breathe. Pacing is one of the trickiest things to nail down with writing.

There’s two types of pacing, both of which play into each other. First, is line level pacing. This is when you have a super short, choppy sentence, or a sentence is long and windy such as this one. Massive blocks of text are an eyesore for me. No indentation? No em dashes or fun formatting? Come on.

The other type of pacing is the overarching one. This pertains to how bigger parts of the whole interact with one another. The length of a chapter, scene, and act/part. It’s the difference between the sprint that’s a battle scene, and the Sunday stroll that can be investigating clues for a mystery.

Here’s where it becomes a problem: When it takes too long to get to the point. Where we’re going scene after scene of just talking when this was supposed to be an action book. When it takes forever for obvious information to be revealed to the characters. When it feels like we’re just wandering around aimlessly looking for the plot. The reader could also be suffocated by how fast things are moving, and they can’t grow attached to the characters, or get invested in the story because everything is moving so fast

Pacing is a delicate balancing act and one I’m not terribly familiar with. If you’re newer to the writing scene, don’t worry about this as much. But definitely do care. Take note of pacing in books you read, see when and why you’re growing bored, and all manner of different things. As always, do some further research.


Factor Five: Detested Tropes and Clichés

Found on Pinterest

One of my least favorite “harmless” tropes is the “very quirky and not like the others” kinds of characters. Ooh, they just annoy me to no end. You just really like comic books. Congrats. Don’t care.

A trope is something that is commonly used in genres (like a magic boarding school) and doesn’t necessarily have a negative connotation. A cliché is a trope that is overused and something most people are sick of seeing when not subverted (like some random kid stumbling into powers and becoming super powerful and is now adjacent to a god).

Anyhow, we all have those tropes that we could go on for ages about. Whenever they make a sudden appearance we roll our eyes or want to toss the book across the room. There is a time and place for all sorts of tropes and clichés, and just because one is being used that doesn’t mean it’s inherently cheap. I’m going to list some of the more vile ones out (in no particular order):

  • Pointless Racism, sexism (both ways), homophobia, transphobia, and ableism 
  • Glorified abuser
  • Toxic Love triangle
  • The one useless best friend who’s only there to serve the protagonist
  • Sugarcoated relationship abuse 
  • No one gets to be happy because this is dark and broody and super serious
  • Forced romance
  • Girl on girl hate for no better reason than to get the attention of a boy
  • A friendship must always turn into a romantic relationship
  • Men always have to fight each other and have sex because reasons
  • The female lead is a glorified sex object
  • Slut shaming
  • Fat shaming
  • The villainization of minority coded characters (LGBTQ+, people with mental or physical disabilities, people of color, and a whole host of others)
  • Stereotypes of minorities — especially racial
  • The savior complex
  • A character being outed for the sole sake of plot/the other person wants to be in a relationship
  • The glorification/downplay of sexual assault

I’m sure there’s so many that I’m forgetting. Now, these can be used if they’re utilized tactfully. They’re horrendous if it’s transparent that this is reflective of the author’s viewpoint, or there’s nothing counteracting these tropes, the characters don’t learn from these toxic viewpoints/actions, etc.

Here are some more commonly disliked tropes/clichés — though, these are far more subjective:

  • Chosen ones
  • “It was all a dream”
  • Here comes the calvary!
  • No communication whatsoever
  • The wise old person that always gets killed off (always)
  • Dead parents
  • Everybody has this terrible tragic past yet they don’t have any form of trauma
  • NO ONE GOES TO THERAPY NO ONE HAS TRUMA?? HOW? Y’ALL AREN’T OKAY
  • Bro I just met you but I’m so totally in love. Mm yes, true love. 
  • Long, long descriptions of the characters examining themselves in the mirror
  • And you’re overpowered, and you’re over powered, and you’re overpowered, and…
  • This is how the human body works, oh yes, absolutely. 
  • ‘Yer a wizard Har—

Responses to my question of “What annoys you in books?” from my followers and friends on Instagram. 

Found on Pinterest

If you want to be included in future posts, make sure to keep an eye out on my socials for when I ask questions. I love interacting with y’all!

From Araya (@ray2_a): Tropes she hates: the damsel in distress, negative queer coding, and racial stereotyping.

From Harper (@the_magical_booknerd): “Honestly, I’m just sick of repetitive books that all have such similar stories.”

From Kiley (@kileyraica) “Overly dramatic characters when there’s no need to be dramatic.” 


Why are we so bothered by bad writing?

Found on Pinterest

Obviously I’m a top psychologist in every field imaginable and know everything that has to do with humans. I’m just overqualified to speak on the human condition and why we do what we do.

Here’s what I think: when we notice faults in the prose, or we grow bored by the pacing, or any number of things I mentioned previously, we get taken out of the story. We’re reminded that this is all fiction and it ruins the flow.

We want to effortlessly be sucked into a new world filled with impossible scenarios and loveable characters, and when faulty writing interrupts, we lose that connection. This is especially true if it applies to published works that readers have paid for. With most online content, we’re more forgiving because we’re getting this for free and obviously it’s a work of passion.

Besides, mistakes can simply be annoying, and we don’t want to be annoyed while doing something pleasurable.


Conclusion:

Found on Pinterest

Being (presumably) human, we make mistakes; it’s inevitable. People aren’t expecting flawless work, but we do expect polished work — especially if we had to pay for it. I know I have made just about all of these mistakes in my own fictional work, but that’s okay.

If you think your writing is “bad”, that’s fine, but don’t let that stop you from trying to write and thus improving. If you think that your work is void of any mistakes whatsoever, then, well, I don’t know what to tell ya other than it isn’t as perfect as you think.

Naturally, all of these things have the possibility of being subjective, and what looks like a major flaw to me may not be a big deal to you. Taste exists.


Thank you for reading and I hope you get to have a buttery croissant later.

Please consider following this blog!

~ Jay


  1. Tom Crossley's avatar
  2. J. V. Montague's avatar
  3. geekosupremo's avatar

Categories
Opinions Writing in General

NaNoWriMo, Burnout, and Writers

For y’all doing NaNoWriMo: May the writing gods have mercy on your soul.

Written November 1, 2020

For the plebs who are sitting unaware of what NaNoWriMo is, NaNoWriMo stands for “National Novel Writing Month”, and you’d never guess what it’s all about.

I myself won’t be participating because I don’t wish to put that kind of pressure on my being, and I don’t have a novel prepped for it. I also value myself so… (I say in jest. I obviously don’t. I’m a teenager in the 21st century, self value is for those who have dignity).

Having never participated in– do I have to write it again? The Thing. I have never done The Thing, thus I cannot speak for how effective it is or how much it leads to burnout. For some it’s extremely beneficial, for others it’s a hassle, and some fear it. Knocking out 50k words in a month is commendable, something to be celebrated and respected, but when it comes to the overall creative process, how efficient is crunching word counts?

When is crunching word counts beneficial?

It’s primarily useful for professionals; for those who have a strict deadline looming over their heads like an anvil. These people don’t have a choice, so, I hope that they do get used to it (otherwise, yikes). They’re still human and not immune to burnout.

I’m separating “burnout” from “writer’s block” in the sense that burnout directly relates to over-working yourself.

Getting a hefty amount of work done in a small amount of time is obviously productive, and here in the US, where our worth is measured by our output, this is a decidedly good thing. You get the damn draft over with. One could be an over-planner, or they detest drafting, or they have been putting off writing the book of their heart for far too long and this is the kick in the ass they need.

When is crunching word counts harmful?

Burnout. It’s easy to neglect yourself when you’re so hyper focused on getting something done. When one should be relaxing with easy entertainment of choice, they’re by the computer slamming in that last couple hundred words. Do this often enough, with enough distaste for doing it, and you have yourself a toxic cocktail of “I really don’t wanna fuckin’ write.”

One doesn’t necessarily lead to the other, but it’s something to be weary of.

So?

Make sure to treat yourself to as much sunshine as you can get. Take the time to enjoy the simple things in life. Watch that show. Respect your boundaries.

Remember, you have time. If you’re writing a novel for yourself, and only yourself, take the time to enjoy it. It doesn’t have to be a businesses yet, so don’t treat it like one. Do as much as you can do then go from there; it’ll help you far more in the long run to be economical now and have a person left to finish the project.

Keep on truckin’ at the pace you wish, always taking stops and enjoying the scenery.


I know this means so much coming from a not-a-one such as myself, but sometimes it just takes some words on a magic screen (I don’t know, man. I like to think it’s magic. Let me have this.) to tell you something you already know for it to stick. Until next time, don’t die.

~ Jay